Organizational and Legal Issues of Prosecutor’s Supervision of Noncustodial Penalties’ Enforcement


  • Igor Olegovich Antonov
  • Andrey Yurievich Verin
  • Marina Evgenievna Klyukova
  • Elena Vladimirovna Nechaeva
  • Iulia A. Krokhina


Palabras clave:

prosecutor's supervision, acts of prosecutor's response to the violation of the law, criminal execut


The article deals with a set of issues related to the due course of law in the execution of punishments not related to isolation from society, and which have recently become widespread in the framework of the implementation of one of the directions of the state's policy in the field of combating crime - the expansion of types of punishments alternative to imprisonment. The author analyzes the powers of the prosecutor's office as a guarantor of compliance with the rule of law in the field of prosecutorial supervision, the purpose of which is, on the one hand, to identify, suppress and prevent violations of the law in the execution of criminal sentences and prevention of recurrence of crimes, and on the other, to respect the rights and legitimate interests of convicts.


Antonov, I. O., Verin, A. Y., Klyukova, M. E., & Nechaeva, E. V. (2019). Improvement of Institution of Parole Release and Its Implementation Practices. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 9(4), 205.

Barkow, R. E. (2009). Organizational Guidelines for the Prosecutor’s Office. Cardozo L. Rev., 31, 2089.

Becker, G. S., & Stigler, G. J. (1974). Law enforcement, malfeasance, and compensation of enforcers. The Journal of Legal Studies, 3(1), 1–18.

Borovyk, A. (2018). The State Of Researching In Science The Problems Concerning Motives Of Committing Corruptible And Other Criminal Offences In The Sphere Of Punishment Execution Of Ukraine. KELM (Knowledge, Education, Law, and Management), 24(4), 43–56.

Bury, V. E. (2015). Scientific and Methodical Recommendations About Criminological Forecasting of Convicts’behaviour, Conditionally Released from Places of Imprisonment. Редакционный Совет, 27.

Carlson, P. M., & Garrett, J. S. (1999). Prison and jail administration: Practice and theory. Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Dobryakov, D. A. (2020). The Legal Status of a Lawyer in The Russian Federation and The Republic of Korea: Comparative-Legal Analysis. RUDN Journal of Law, 24(2), 353–388.

Doherty, M. (2000). Criminal justice and penology. Old Bailey.

Green, B. A., & Roiphe, R. (2017). Rethinking Prosecutors’ Conflicts of Interest. BCL Rev., 58, 463.

Kozachenko, I. J., & Sergeev, D. N. (2013). Postpenitentional Control and Repeating Crime Prevention. Russian Journal of Criminology, 2, 74–80.

Kozybaeva, G. B., Piddubnyi, O. Y., Balykin, I. I., Balykina-Halanets, L. I., & Shatkovskyi, Y. N. (2019). Comparative Legal Analysis of Educational Measures for Minors Who Have Committed an Administrative Offense in Kazakhstan and Ukraine. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 10(1 (39)), 274–284.

Miethe, T. D., & Lu, H. (2005). Punishment: A comparative historical perspective. Cambridge University Press.

Olkhovik, N. V. (2018). The Effectiveness of Criminal Punishment Without A Deprivation Of Liberty. Russian Journal of Criminology, 12(1), 51–59.

Paneyakh, E. (2014). Faking performance together: Systems of performance evaluation in Russian enforcement agencies and production of bias and privilege. Post-Soviet Affairs, 30(2–3), 115–136.

Plieva, A. S. (2013). Features of the prosecutor”s supervision over the execution of the laws on federal security, international relations and combating extremism. Вопросы Российского и Международного Права, 7–8, 62–79.

Safronov, V. V., Babaeva, A. A., Farafontova, E. L., Petrova, G. I., & Schebliakov, E. S. (2019). The substance and content of environmental supervisory activities in the Russian Federation. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 315(2), 022020.

Shcherbakov, A. V., Shabanov, V. B., Budanova, L. Y., Alexandrova, O. P., & Demidov, O. G. (2019). The Problems of the Replacement of Alternative Penalties Taking into Account the Implementation of International Standards: Case of Some Post-Soviet Countries. KnE Social Sciences, 37–50.

Strossen, N. (1989). Recent US and international judicial protection of individual rights: A comparative legal process analysis and proposed synthesis. Hastings LJ, 41, 805.

Tabolina, K., & Tabolin, V. (2020). Prosecutor’s Supervision in Criminal Proceedings in the Context of the Leading Development of Digital Relations. 6th International Conference on Social, Economic, and Academic Leadership (ICSEAL-6-2019), 376–381.

Teplyashin, P. (2010). Limitation of freedom as a criminal punishment: Issues of legislative regulation and effectiveness in special crime prevention. Russian Journal of Criminology, 4, 51–57.




Cómo citar

Olegovich Antonov, I., Yurievich Verin, A., Evgenievna Klyukova, M., Vladimirovna Nechaeva, E., & A. Krokhina, I. (2020). Organizational and Legal Issues of Prosecutor’s Supervision of Noncustodial Penalties’ Enforcement. Revista San Gregorio, 1(41).