Parliamentary-presidential or presidential-parliamentary republic as modes of one political model or different concepts of government

Mychailo V. Kostytsky; Nataliia V. Kushakova-Kostytska; Vitalii M. Kravets; Oleg V. Pavlyshyn; Olena Y. Kovtun

doi:10.36097/rsan.v1i42.1551

Servicio de ayuda de la revista

Usuario/a

Información

Notificaciones

Idioma

Tamaño de fuente

Open Journal Systems

Herramientas del artículo

Imprima este artículo

Metadatos de indexación

Cómo citar un elemento

Política de revisión

Envíe este artículo por correo electrónico (Inicie sesión)

Enviar un correo electrónico al autor/a (Inicie sesión)

Parliamentary-presidential or presidential-parliamentary republic as modes of one political model or different concepts of government

Mychailo V. Kostytsky, Nataliia V. Kushakova-Kostytska, Vitalii M. Kravets, Oleg V. Pavlyshyn, Olena Y. Kovtun

Resumen

This research paper deals with the scientific research of institutional-procedural and behavioral attributes, principles and indicators of typology of mixed-type republics in European countries. The conducted scientific analysis gives grounds to argue that the defining directions in this context are the appeal to the problems of formation and activity of governments and the possibility of dissolving parliaments (ie scientific institutional and procedural differentiation of hybrid republican forms), dualism, legality and responsibility of executive bodies, as well as the index of presidential powers and the peculiarities of the dualism of the executive branch.

Palabras clave

semi-presidentialism, presidential-parliamentary republic, parliamentary-presidential republic, mixe

Texto completo:

PDF (English)

Referencias

Beuman, L. M. (2015). Cohabitation in new post-conflict democracies: The Case of Timor-Leste. Parliamentary Affairs, 68(3), 453–475.

Chaisty, P., Cheeseman, N., & Power, T. (2017). Rethinking the ‘presidentialism debate’: conceptualizing coalitional politics in crossregional perspective. Democratization, 21(1),72-94.

Derbyshire, D., & Derbyshire, I. (1996). Political systems of the world. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.

Duverger, M. A. (1980). New political system model: semi-presidential government. European Journal of Political Research, 8(2), 165–187.

Economist Intelligence Unit (2019). Index of democracy 2019. Retrieved from https://www.eiu.com/topic/democracy-index

Elgie, R. (2014). Executive leadership in semi-presidential systems. In R. A. W. Rhodes & P. T. Hart (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political leadership (p. 472-489). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Elgie, R. (2018). Political leadership: A pragmatic institutionalist approach. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Erdem Aytac, A., & Carkoglu, A. (2018). Presidents shaping public opinion in parliamentary democracies: a survey experiment in Turkey. Political Behavior, 40, 371–393.

Feijó, R. G. (2016). Dynamics of democracy in Timor-Leste, 1999-2012. The birth of a democratic nation. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.

Fernandes, J. &, Jalali. C. A. (2017). Resurgent presidency? Portuguese semi-presidentialism and the 2016 elections. South European Society and Politics, 22(1), 121–138.

Fortin, J. (2013). Measuring presidential powers: Some pitfalls of aggregate measurement. International Political Science Review, 34(1), 91–112.

Ganghof, S. (2017). A new political system model: Semi-parliamentary government. European Journal of Political Research, 57(2), 261–281.

Hague, R., Harrop, M., & Breslin, S. (1998). Comparative government and politics: An Introduction. London, UK: The Macmillan Press.

Horowitz, D. (1990). Comparing democratic systems. Journal of Democracy, 1(4), 73–79.

Jung-Hsiang, T. (2017). The triangular relationship between the president, prime minister, and parliament in semi-presidentialism: Analyzing Taiwan and Poland. Soochow Journal of Political Science, 35(2), 1–71.

Kim, Y. A. (2015). Troubled marriage? Divided minority government, cohabitation, presidential powers, president-parliamentarism and semi-presidentialism. Government and Opposition, 50(4), 652–681.

Lijphart, A. (1997). Nomination: Trichotomy or dichotomy. European Journal of Political Research, 31(1–2), 125–128.

Lijphart, A. (2014). Constitutional design for divided societies. Journal of Democracy, 15(2), 96–109.

Molder, M. (2014). Coherence of coalition governments across types of parliamentarism. Retrieved from https://ecpr.eu/Filestore/PaperProposal/bf128333-22b8-4abd-85fb-eb9dfa435e83.pdf

Sartori, G. (1994). Compare why and how: comparing, miscomparing and the comparative method. In M. Dogan & A. Kazancigil, Comparing nations: concepts, strategies and substance (p. 14-34). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

Sartori, G. (1997). Comparative constitutional engineering. An inquiry into structures, incentives and outcomes. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Sartori, G. (2004). Ingegneria costituzionale comparata. Structuri, stimulente si rezultate [Comparative constitutional engineering. Structures stimulating the results]. Bologna, Italy: Il Mulino.

Sedelius, T., & Linde, J. (2018). Unravelling semi-presidentialism: Democracy and government performance under four distinct regime types. Democratization, 25(1), 136–157.

Taghiyev, E. (2006). Measuring presidential power in post-soviet countries. CEU Political Science Journal, 3, 11–21.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.36097/rsan.v1i42.1551