Features and essence of the legal process
Palabras clave:legal process, jurisdictional process, judicial process, legal proceedings, procedural law
The paper considers the problem of understanding the legal process. The modern procedural legislation is analyzed for the existence of a legal process definition. The complexity and multifacetedness of the legal process manifestation was noted. The authors analyzed the current state of the problem on determining the essence of the legal process. The scientific works of Russian and foreign scientists devoted to the study of the nature of the legal process have been studied. Traditional (narrow) and universal (wide) scientific approaches to understanding the object of research are noted. The analysis of the legal process features identified in the legal science is carried out. The paper takes into account the legal science achievements and the peculiarities of the procedural and legal activity, on the basis of which the authors updated the idea of the modern legal process. As a result of the work, the main features of the legal process are identified, and its essence is determined. The essence of the legal process is presented as a system of basic features that give it a qualitative certainty. A study of this problem was conducted to establish a unified approach to understanding the legal process that ensures the unambiguity and certainty of the concept used. It is necessary to introduce into the procedural legislation its official definition with a view to eliminating in the practical activity the confusion of the legal process with related phenomena of legal reality: a jurisdictional process, a judicial process, and legal proceedings.
The Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation dated December 18, (2001). N 174-FZ (edition of 27.06.2018). Collection of the legislation of the Russian Federation. N 52 (Part I). Article 4921.
The Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation dated November 14, (2002). N 138-FZ (edition of 27.06.2018). Collection of the legislation of the Russian Federation. N 46. Article 4532.
Budget Code of the Russian Federation dated July 31, (1998). N 145-FZ (edition of June 4, 2013 ). Meeting of the legislation of the Russian Federation. N 31. Article 3823.
Savitsky, V. M. (1983). Problems of judicial law. p. 224.
Abramov, S. N. (1952). The Soviet civil process. p. 420.
Strogovich, M. S. (1968). Course of the Soviet criminal process. V. 1, p. 468.
Vassiliev, A. M. (1976). Legal Categories. - M., p. 264.
Bonner, A. T. (1978). Karl Marx on the relationship between substantive law and the process. Jurisprudence. No. 5, pp. 23-31.
Alekseev, S. S. (1981). General theory of law. V. 1, p. 361.
Salishcheva, N. G. (1964). Administrative Process in the USSR. p. 158.
Gorshenev, V. M. (1983). Theory of the legal. Kharkov: Vyshcha shkola, p. 192.
Sorokin, V. D. (1972). Administrative Procedural Law. 569 p. pp. 126 - 128.
Soldatova, O. E. (2014). Legal process (theoretical and legal aspect). The theses of the Cand.Psych. Barnaul, p. 178.
Lukyanova, E. G. (2003). Theory of procedural law. - Moscow: Publishing House NORMA, p. 240.
Oxford Russian Dictionary. (2007). Fourth edition. - New York, Oxford University Press, 2007.
Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary of Current English. (2005). Seventh edition. - New York, Oxford University Press.
Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. (2007). Sixth edition. Vol. 2: NZ. - New York, Oxford University Press.
Fridd, M. A. N. (2000). (Oxon) Barrister. Basic practice in courts, tribunals and inquiries. London. p. 384.
Adams, J. N., Brownsword, R (2006). Understanding law. - London, p. 335.
Colin, J., Morris, R. (1996). Interpreters and the Legal Process, Waterside Press. ProQuest Ebook Central, http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kazanst-ebooks/detail.action?docID=3416304.
Damaska, M. R. (1991). The Faces of Justice and the State Authority: A Comparative Approach to the Legal Process, Yale University Press, ProQuest Ebook Central, http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kazanst-ebooks/detail.action?docID=3421293.
Cox, G. W., Mathew, D. (2005). McCubbins. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the US House of Representatives, Cambridge University Press, ProQuest Ebook Central, http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kazanst-ebooks/detail.action?docID=321239.
Xanthaki, H. (2008). Stefanou, Constantin. Drafting Legislation: A Modern Approach, Routledge, ProQuest Ebook Central, http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kazanst-ebooks/detail.action?docID=438516.
Kulapov, V. L., Malko, A. V. (2011). Theory of State and Law: Textbook. Saratov branch of the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences. - Moscow: Norma: INFRA-M, p. 384.
Pavlushina, A. A. (2006). Theory of legal process: problems and prospects of development: the Dissertation of the doctor of juridical science: 12.00.01. - Samara: RSL, p. 459.
Bakhrakh, D. N. (2000). Administrative Law of Russia: A Textbook for Universities. -M.: NORM - INFRA-M, p. 640.
Makhina, S. N. (1999). Administrative Process: Problems of Theory, Prospects of Legal Regulation / Scientific Editor Yu. N. Starilov. - Voronezh: Publisher VSU. pp. 42-44.
Kuksin, I. S. (2008). The legal process: essence and meaning. Modern law. No. 6. pp. 75-78.
Stepanenko, R. F., Soldatova, A. V. (2017). Review of materials of the IV All-Russian "round table" on general theoretical problems of law and the state "Constitution and constitutionalism: problems of lawmaking and law enforcement ". Law and the state: theory and practice. No. 3. pp. 121 - 137.
(Chulyukin L.D. Report on the topic: "Lawmaking, law enforcement and legal process").
Chulyukin, L. D., Sevostyanov, A. A. (2011). System relations of types of public legal process. Bulletin of Economics, Law and Sociology. No. 3. pp. 158-162.
Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).