Civil rights: How possible are the preconditions and provocation form Crimes in conditions of sanctions of foreign countries


  • Maxim A. Zinkovsky


Palabras clave:

abuse of civil law, civil tort, crime, sanctions of foreign countries, provocation of crime


The present article is devoted to the abuses and circumvention of regulations in the civil law, in the situation of foreign countries sanctions. Modern geopolitics ask for our country's timely legal and political reactions to the increasing sanctions of foreign countries. Such a situation is skillfully combined with the consequences of the global financial crisis and is a fertile ground for the growth of fictitious bankruptcies, unilateral refusal of fulfilling civil-law obligations, and actions to bypass the law. Abuses and circumvention of regulations in the civil law can be sustainable prerequisites for the growth of crimes in the conditions of sanctions in foreign countries. The work was performed under the grant of the President of the Russian Federation for the state support of young Russian scientists and candidates of Sciences (Competition – МК-918.2018.6). The subject of study is the «Legal challenges to improve the quality and competitiveness of goods, works and services under the sanctions of civil turnover of the Russian Federation».


Belyaeva, G. S., Makogon, B. V., Bezugly, S. N., Prokhorova, M. L., & Szpoper, D. (2017). Basic Ideas of State Power Limitation in Political and Legal Doctrine. J. Pol. & L., 10, 197.

Ol'ga, V., Kuksin, I. N., Makogon, B. V., Spektor, L. A., & Vladimirova, O. V. (2018). Restrictive-regulatory potential of procedural standard. Revista Publicando, 5(14), 830-836.

Kuksin, I. N., Markhgeym, M. V., Novikova, A. E., & Tonkov, E. E. (2016). Justice as Principle: Aspects of Genesis in Social and Regulatory Systems. The Social Sciences, 11(10), 2367-2370.

Makogon, B. V., Markhgeym, M. V., Novikova, A. E., Nikonova, L. I., & Stus, N. V. (2018). Constitutional Justice in Circumstances of Public Authority Limits. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 7(2), 722-728.

Butko, L. V., Markhgeym, M. V., Novikova, A. E., Pozharova, L. A., & Tonkov, E. E. (2017). Personal Dignity in the European Legal Culture. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 6(4), 296-303.

Muyambiri, B., & Chabaefe, N. N. (2018). The Finance – Growth Nexus in Botswana: A Multivariate Causal Linkage. Dutch Journal of Finance and Management, 2(2), 03.

Ashworth A.J. (1976). The Doctrine of Provocation. The Cambridge Law Journal. - Volume 35. - Issue 2. - P. 292-320. DOI: 10.1017/S0008197300012046.

Spencer J.R. (2001). Entrapment and the European Convention on Human Rights. The Cambridge Law Journal. - Vol. 60. - Part 1. - P. 30 – 33.

Virgo G. (2001). Provocation: Muddying the waters. The Cambridge Law Journal. - Vol. 60. - Part 1. - P. 23 – 25.

Osipov A.L. (2014). Problems of rendering the qualified legal aid by the lawyer defender on the criminal cases connected with provocation of a crime. The Bulletin of University of O.E. Kutafin. - №. 1. – P. 90-97.

Cherepakhin V.A. (2014). Types of provocation of a crime. In the collection: Modern problems of criminal policy V International scientific and practical conference. Under the editorial office A.N. Ilyashenko. – P. 198-208.

Fijnaut C., Paoli L. (2014). Organised Crime in Europe, Concepts, Patterns and Control Policies in the European Union and Beyond. Dordrecht: Springer. - P. 795-821.

Finkenauer J. (2005). Problems of definition: what is organised crime? Trends in Organised Crime. - Vol. № 8. - Issue № 3. - Springer. - Р. 63–83. DOI: 10.1007/s12117-005-1038-4.

Nelken D. (2015). Post-Soviet criminal justice and comparative criminology // Theoretical Criminology –Vol. № 19(2). – Р. 289–295. DOI: 10.1177/1362480615581106.

J.V. Dijk. (2007). Mafia markers: assessing organised crime and its impact upon societies. Trends in Organised Crime. - Vol. № 10. - Issue № 4. – Springer. – Р. 39 - 56. DOI:10.1007/s12117-007-9013-x/.

R. Arnold. (2015). Systematic racist violence in Russia between ‘hate crime’ and ‘ethnic conflict’. Theoretical Criminology. –Vol. № 19(2). – Р. 239–256. DOI: 10.1177/1362480615581102.

L. Piacentini, G. Slade. (2015). Architecture and attachment: Carceral collectivism and the problem of prison reform in Russia and Georgia. Theoretical Criminology. - Vol. № 19(2). – P. 179 - 197. DOI: 10.1177/1362480615571791.

Torry W.I. (2001). Social change, crime, and culture: The defense of provocation. Crime, Law and Social Change.– Vol. № 36. - Issue № 3. – Р. 309-325.

Ferzan K.K. (2013). Provocateurs. Criminal Law and Philosophy. - Vol. № 7. – Issue № 3. – Р. 597–622.

Suvorov E.D. (2008). Law bypass. The transaction arranging a law bypass. - M.: Publishing House V. Ema. - 188 p.

Yumashev N.S. (2015). About the principle of conscientiousness, a law bypass also you will lock abuses of the right in regulations of the civil and criminal procedure legislation. the Russian investigating officer. - №. 15. – P. 34 – 40.

Karapetov A.G., Savelyev A.I. (2012). Freedom of the conclusion of not named agreements and its limits. The Bulletin of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation. - №. 4. – P. 12 – 56.

Uralova A.A. (2014). The mixed agreement in «a law bypass». The Lawyer. - № 3. – P. 13 – 15.

Bruinsma G., Bernasco W. (2004). Criminal groups and transnational illegal markets. Crime, Law and Social Change.– Vol. № 41. – Issue №1. – Р. 79–94. DOI: 10.1023/B:CRIS.0000015283.13923.aa.

Chaikin D.A. (1991). Money laundering: An investigatory perspective. Criminal Law Forum.– Vol. № 2. – Issue № 3. – Р. 467–510. DOI: 10.1007/BF01096484.

Barone R., Cerqueti R., Quaranta A.G. (2012). Illegal finance and usurers behaviour. European Journal of Law and Economics.– Vol. № 34. – Issue № 2. Р. 265–277. DOI: 10.1007/s10657-010-9183-x.




Cómo citar

A. Zinkovsky, M. (2019). Civil rights: How possible are the preconditions and provocation form Crimes in conditions of sanctions of foreign countries. Revista San Gregorio, 1(30).