Mediation as an alternative dispute resolution: world experience


  • Kseniya I. Korobko


Palabras clave:

civil procedure, mediation, alternative dispute resolution, adr, conciliation


The present paper is devoted to the application of mediation as an alternative dispute resolution procedure. It defines features of the legal regulation of mediation procedures in different countries and legal systems, such as United States, European Union, China, and Russian Federation. In addition, the main principles of mediation and their implementation in different legal systems are analyzed in this paper. Furthermore, the reasons for the emergence of this institution in these countries are determined and the circumstances hindering development of mediation have been identified. Moreover, conclusions concerning the degree of development of alternative dispute resolution have been formulated.


Folberg, J. (2019). Development of Mediation Practice in the United States, (accessed February 5, 2019)

Goodin, R., (1999). Mediation: An Overview of Alternative Dispute Resolution, Mediation and the Courts, vol. 4, issue 3, p. 13

Silvestri, E., (2012). Alternative Dispute Resolution in the European Union: Review, Bulletin of the Civil Process, issue 6.

Knut, B., P (2013). issler Mediation in China: Threat to the Rule of Law? Mediation: Principles and Regulation in Comparative Perspective, Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2013.

Brown, J., Harvey, K., Kovick, D., & Susskind, E. L. (2009). Teaching About the Mediation of Values-Based and Identity-Based Disputes: A Teaching Note/D. Kovick, LE Susskind [USA]: Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School.

Shabalina, E.A., (2016). Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Form of Mediation: the US Experience, Competition Law, issue 4, pp. 43-46

Tang Houzhi Worldwide Use of Mediation, (2019) (accessed February 5, 2019)

Alternative Dispute Resolution Act of 1998, (accessed February 5, 2019)

Directive 2008/52/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of May 21, 2008 on Certain Aspects of Mediation in Civil and Commercial Matters, (accessed February 5, 2019)

Code of Civil Procedure of Germany (2019). (Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO)), (accessed February 5, 2019)

Code of Civil Procedure of France (2019). (accessed February 5, 2019)

McFadden, D. (2015). Developments in International Commercial Mediation: US, UK, Asia, India and EU. Contemp. Asia Arb. J., 8, 299.

Tai, M., & McDonald, D. (2012). Judicial Mediation in Mainland China Explained, July 30. (accessed February 5, 2019)

Mityakina N.M.; Tsukanova E.Yu.; Sinenko V.S.; Turanin V.Yu.; Fedoryaschenko A.S. (2018). National and International Organizations – Coordinators of Economic Activity, Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, vol. 10, issue 4,

Zare, H., & Zade, A. R. S. (2014). The Application of Tichy's Model In Iranian Public Universities. UCT Journal of Management and Accounting Studies, 2(1).

Civil Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China, (2019).

Samokhvalov N.A. (2016). The Five-year Anniversary of the Institution of Mediation in Russian Legal Practice: First Results, Lawyer, issue16, pp. 42-46




Cómo citar

I. Korobko, K. (2019). Mediation as an alternative dispute resolution: world experience. Revista San Gregorio, 1(30).