Ethics and knowledge: a debate that never ends
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36097/rgcs.v2i2.3181Keywords:
research ethics, ethics committees, artificial intelligence, bioethical dilemmas, university educationAbstract
This editorial reflects on the enduring tension between scientific-technological progress and the ethical considerations that should accompany it. Through historical and current examples—such as artificial intelligence in medical diagnostics, gene editing, or clinical trials involving vulnerable populations—the authors raise fundamental questions about moral responsibility in the production of knowledge. The role of Human Research Ethics Committees (CEISHs) is emphasized, especially in the Ecuadorian context, where their consolidation in universities is crucial for ensuring the integrity of academic projects. The editorial emphasizes the importance of linking Knowledge Integration Projects with ethical review processes, particularly when human participants are involved. It concludes by asserting that ethics in science must go beyond regulations and be understood as a personal and collective commitment to guide knowledge toward the common good.
Downloads
References
Derevianko, A., Pizzoli, S. F. M., Pesapane, F., Rotili, A., Monzani, D., Grasso, R., Cassano, E., & Pravettoni, G. (2023). The Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the Radiology Field: What Is the State of Doctor–Patient Communication in Cancer Diagnosis? Cancers, 15(2), 470. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15020470
Goktas, P., & Grzybowski, A. (2025). Shaping the Future of Healthcare: Ethical Clinical Challenges and Pathways to Trustworthy AI. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(5), 1605. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14051605
Mendoza, D. I., Zambrano, J. M., Tejena, C. E., & García, M. A. (2024). James Marion Sims: Medical progress and its ethical cost. Seminars in Medical Writing and Education, 3, 582. https://doi.org/10.56294/mw2024582
Oliveira, R. C. d., & Silva, R. D. d. S. e. (2023). Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture: Benefits, Challenges, and Trends. Applied Sciences, 13(13), 7405. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13137405
Rappuoli, R. (2014). Inner Workings: 1885, the first rabies vaccination in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(34), 12273. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1414226111
Rathjen, L., & Stähelin, J. (2022). Towards a Negative History of Science: The Unknown, Errors, Ignorance, and the “Pseudosciences”. Histories, 2(2), 146-156. https://doi.org/10.3390/histories2020011
Sappor, E. E., & Chakraborty, R. (2025). Exploring Staff Perceptions of the Management of Clinical Trials and Its Impact on Enhancing Health Service Delivery. Hospitals, 2(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/hospitals2010001
Thomas, S. B., & Quinn, S. C. (1991). The Tuskegee Syphilis Study, 1932 to 1972: implications for HIV education and AIDS risk education programs in the black community. American Journal of Public Health, 1(11), 1498-1505. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.81.11.1498
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Alfredo L. Marín, Mario A. García

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


























