Ethics and knowledge: a debate that never ends

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36097/rgcs.v2i2.3181

Keywords:

research ethics, ethics committees, artificial intelligence, bioethical dilemmas, university education

Abstract

This editorial reflects on the enduring tension between scientific-technological progress and the ethical considerations that should accompany it. Through historical and current examples—such as artificial intelligence in medical diagnostics, gene editing, or clinical trials involving vulnerable populations—the authors raise fundamental questions about moral responsibility in the production of knowledge. The role of Human Research Ethics Committees (CEISHs) is emphasized, especially in the Ecuadorian context, where their consolidation in universities is crucial for ensuring the integrity of academic projects. The editorial emphasizes the importance of linking Knowledge Integration Projects with ethical review processes, particularly when human participants are involved. It concludes by asserting that ethics in science must go beyond regulations and be understood as a personal and collective commitment to guide knowledge toward the common good.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Derevianko, A., Pizzoli, S. F. M., Pesapane, F., Rotili, A., Monzani, D., Grasso, R., Cassano, E., & Pravettoni, G. (2023). The Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the Radiology Field: What Is the State of Doctor–Patient Communication in Cancer Diagnosis? Cancers, 15(2), 470. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15020470

Goktas, P., & Grzybowski, A. (2025). Shaping the Future of Healthcare: Ethical Clinical Challenges and Pathways to Trustworthy AI. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(5), 1605. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14051605

Mendoza, D. I., Zambrano, J. M., Tejena, C. E., & García, M. A. (2024). James Marion Sims: Medical progress and its ethical cost. Seminars in Medical Writing and Education, 3, 582. https://doi.org/10.56294/mw2024582

Oliveira, R. C. d., & Silva, R. D. d. S. e. (2023). Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture: Benefits, Challenges, and Trends. Applied Sciences, 13(13), 7405. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13137405

Rappuoli, R. (2014). Inner Workings: 1885, the first rabies vaccination in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(34), 12273. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1414226111

Rathjen, L., & Stähelin, J. (2022). Towards a Negative History of Science: The Unknown, Errors, Ignorance, and the “Pseudosciences”. Histories, 2(2), 146-156. https://doi.org/10.3390/histories2020011

Sappor, E. E., & Chakraborty, R. (2025). Exploring Staff Perceptions of the Management of Clinical Trials and Its Impact on Enhancing Health Service Delivery. Hospitals, 2(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/hospitals2010001

Thomas, S. B., & Quinn, S. C. (1991). The Tuskegee Syphilis Study, 1932 to 1972: implications for HIV education and AIDS risk education programs in the black community. American Journal of Public Health, 1(11), 1498-1505. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.81.11.1498

Published

2025-07-31

How to Cite

Marín, A. L., & García, M. A. (2025). Ethics and knowledge: a debate that never ends. Revista Gregoriana De Ciencias De La Salud, 2(2), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.36097/rgcs.v2i2.3181

Similar Articles

1-10 of 45

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.